What Price for a Natural Treasure?

In the summer of 2012, billions across the World enjoyed the spectacle of the London Olympics. In the UK alone, 23m watched the tremendous, tear jerking opening ceremony and overall the event has been hailed as @one of the most successful ‘games ever”.

We’re now less than a year forward and the arguments continue about a key facet of any national spectacle once the TV crews have gone – the legacy.

Different events have created differing legacies. Ask the residents of Sheffield who are still paying for the 1991 Student Games or conversely the folk of Manchester who’ve seen regeneration and investment on the back of the 2002 Commonwealth Games – and arguably the recreation of Manchester City as a leading edge football club. (I’m not a football fan, so no need to argue on this point!)

With todays news that our national treasure, the Olympic Stadium in East London, will require additional taxpayer money (about £60m in total) to convert it into a suitable asset for West Ham FC to occupy is, in my opinion, a smear on the success of the ‘games and something that shouldn’t be brushed under the carpet.

I can see the arguments for additional investment. No-one wants to see such a great piece of architecture (and frankly, huge capital investment) fall into disrepair. A cracking and weed ridden monument would do nothing for the reputation of  London or the UK – we have all seen the desolation of stadia and amusement parks in New Orleans, or the shells of industry in Detroit that the URBEX community place on YouTube…

What doesn’t chime well for me is that the UK is pebble-dashed with national treasures which also require investment and in their own right these are equally important. These treasures are often supported by local charities, voluntary groups or are owned by overburdened businesses, beset by regulation and legislation.

If I think locally, we have the Birnbeck Pier and Tropicana in Weston super Mare which, with the right cash injection, could create much needed, long term income for the town.

A little further afield, other treasured seaside towns and their piers are struggling to survive. Take Hastings pier now closed and Eastbourne pier which again needs commercial support to help maintain it’s position as one of the finest examples of Eugenius Birch engineering.  

The reason for my interest in this topic is a personal belief that we can use our great heritage to regenerate our lost towns, involve local communities, improve civic pride and in turn create commercial / fiscal inflow.

The discussion for me is one of scale. We spent £12bn on last years ‘games. We’ll spend an additional £60m to make the main stadium rentable, but why are we not sweating the asset more, before paying for a commercial enterprise to occupy this space?

In the ocean that is UK debt, £60m is nothing, but to the projects and towns that I’ve highlighted above, it’s a considerable amount that could help get regional investment off the ground.

I’m fortunate to have lived in and visited many towns in the UK, north and south, east to west. There are examples of national treasures at every extremity of our ‘green and pleasant land’ that need looking at through a different lens and I hope that others out there share my passion. You know where I am!

David Oxendale

  ImageImageImageImage

Advertisements

About The very mobile mentor...

"Life is the name of the game, and I want to play the game with you" as Bruce Forsyth used to sing at the top of 'The Generation Game'. This blog is all about observational, irreverent but sometimes deeply emotional musings of everyday life from my perspective.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What Price for a Natural Treasure?

  1. Mark Radford says:

    David, you got me thinking about this program – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restoration_%28TV_series%29 – that Griff Rhys Jones presented a few years ago. The series put forward worthy buildings for regeneration and the viewers voted on which one should get the money.
    You rightly compared Sheffield and Manchester and their contrasting fortunes. The O2 is in the same category, being ridiculed as a white elephant after the Millennium Experience, – I was one of the 6.5 million visitors (out of a forecast 12 million) who attended. – yet now being regarded as one of the premier venues in the world attracting 7.5 million people each year.
    It’s all about politics and who gets the money. As with the O2, the government could not afford to see the Olympic stadium fail, so it had to do the deal with West Ham. It was just too high profile to let it slip.
    Again, using Sheffield as the example – it’s only a few weeks ago that the news broke that Sheffield City Council could no longer afford to run the Don Valley Stadium. without a buyer, or partner, it will follow the same route as the piers. Obviously, Sheffield can’t shout loud enough.

    • Great to hear from you Mark. I’d read about Don Valley and I agree, there needs to be some (and I hate this phrase) ‘skin in the game’ for the politicians, backers, developers etc.

      The stadia, the museums, the piers all need a combined voice that they don’t have, and I think that’s a gap. It isn’t just happening in the UK either….

      See you soon!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s